Corporate accountability

Corporate actors are not beyond the reach of international criminal law. Civitas Maxima pursues accountability for companies and individuals who profit from war crimes and human rights abuses, standing alongside the victims of those crimes.

What is corporate accountability?

Corporate accountability is a growing movement to hold companies accountable for violations of human rights. This accountability can take the form of criminal, administrative, or civil liability mechanisms where victims of human rights abuses can access justice.

Corporate accountability derives from the idea that corporate actors have a responsibility to respect and promote human rights throughout their entire supply chain, meaning throughout the network of people and other entities involved from the extraction and sourcing of raw materials to the creation and distribution of the final product.

This concept was developed in the 2011 UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. While non-binding, the Guiding Principles provide a widely-accepted framework for addressing responsible business practices.

The framework articulates three overarching core principles: 1. governments have the duty to protect against abuses of human rights, including by companies, by implementing measures to prevent, investigate, punish, and rectify such abuses; 2. businesses should avoid violating persons’ human rights and should undertake to address any harmful human rights effects that they cause; and 3. governments must provide access to effective remedies for those impacted by human rights abuses.

In line with the third principle, corporate accountability aims to break the impunity that corporate actors have enjoyed over the past several decades, even as they exploited child labor, employed violence against their workers, violated land rights and displaced communities, and polluted surrounding environments, to list a few examples.

Holding companies accountable largely takes place domestically, where specific laws enable victims or the government to bring suit not just against individuals associated with the company, but the company itself, for violations of human rights.

The origin of corporate responsibility at Nuremberg

The historical precedent for corporate accountability derives from the so-called “Industrialist trials” held in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. There were three trials prosecuted by authorities from the United States, against forty-two individuals from the Flick, Krupp, and I.G. Farben corporations. These three companies dealt with coal and steel production, steel and heavy weapons, and manufacture of chemicals, respectively. All three were heavily involved in the Nazi government’s build up of military armament.

Of the forty-two defendants, twenty-seven were convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity including the use of slave labor and pillage of German-occupied territories. While the Nuremberg Statute did not provide for direct prosecution of entities (whether companies or States), it clearly enabled the successful prosecution of corporate executives, directors, and managers for crimes committed under the policies of the companies.

Our work

Civitas Maxima works on different cases aimed at holding corporate actors accountable for their participation in international crimes, including in connection with the illegal trade of blood diamonds during the Sierra Leone civil war (1991-2002).

In September 2021, with the support of Civitas Maxima and Center for Accountability and Rule of Law, a victim of the trade in blood diamonds in Sierra Leone filed a criminal complaint before Audiencia Nacional in Spain against businessman Manuel Terrén Parcerisas for international crimes.

Manuel Terrén Parcerisas is presumed to have worked for a company based in Europe that facilitated the illegal trade of precious stones from Sierra Leone through its subsidiaries in West Africa. Between at least 1997 and 2002, Manuel Terrén Parcerisas is alleged to have traded with the non-state armed group Revolutionary United Front for diamonds obtained through the enslavement of civilians in the Sierra Leone diamond-rich district of Kono. The acquired gems were presumably brought to Monrovia, Liberia, and then sold on the international market.
Manuel Terrén Parcerisas was arrested in Malaga, Spain, on 2 July 2024 and subsequently granted release on 24 July 2024. In February 2026, Audiencia Nacional confirmed the expansion of the investigation to include money laundering offences and additional suspects. The investigation is ongoing, with various investigative measures currently underway.

Read more about our topics

International justice

Read more

Learn more

Read our content related to war crimes.
News

“No Safe Haven”: no refuge for torturers in Switzerland

On October 31, the Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council decided to continue its work on the preliminary draft of the federal law on the inclusion of torture in the Swiss Criminal Code, paving the way for its consideration by Parliament.

News

“No Safe Haven”: no refuge for torturers in Switzerland

On October 31, the Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council decided to continue its work on the preliminary draft of the federal law on the inclusion of torture in the Swiss Criminal Code, paving the way for its consideration by Parliament.

News

“No Safe Haven”: no refuge for torturers in Switzerland

On October 31, the Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council decided to continue its work on the preliminary draft of the federal law on the inclusion of torture in the Swiss Criminal Code, paving the way for its consideration by Parliament.

Stay informed

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to be informed of our latest articles.
Subscribe